Conceptual Semantic Understandin Pemahaman Semantik Konseptual Bilangan Pecahan Pada Siswa SMP Islam Samargalila 2 Halmahera Selatan
Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, and Conclusions
Keywords:
Understanding Fractions, Representation, Semantic Triggers, Semantic Congruence.Abstract
Kegiatan pengabdian masyarakat akan dilaksanakan dalam bentuk pemberian motivasi siswa dalam belajar matematika melalui pengenalan matematika khususnya pemahaman kesesuaian semantik representasi bilangan pecahan dan mudah diselesaikan. Metode pengabdian yang laksanakan dalam bentuk structured experential learning cycle. Subjek pengabdian masyarakat ini adalah siswa Kelas IX SMP Islam Samargalila 2 Halmahera Selatan yang berjumlah 33 Siswa yang ikut berpartisipasi 26 orang siswa. Berdasarkan hasil tes awal dipeeroleh pemahaman siswa dengan kategori C (rendah), dan Hasil Tes Akhir diperoleh dengan kategori B (sedang). Hasil kegiatan juga menghasilkan beberapa jenis pemantik semantik konseptual translasi antara bentuk representasi yakni: kesesuaian tujuan makna representasi, kesesuaian deskripsi representasi, kesesuaian menggambarkan situasi (kesesuaian penggunaan konsep-konsep dalam mengonstruksi target). Struktur pemahaman kesesuaian semantik konseptual dari masing-masing proses trasnlasi didasarkan pada tahapan translasi representasi yang terdiri dari tahapan membongkar sumber, tahapan koordinasi awal, tahapan mengonstruksi target, dan tahapan menentukan kesesuaian. Lebih lanjut, walaupun terdapat siswa yang tidak ikut berpartisipasi, dan terdapat kendala teknis seperti jaringan internet, namun semangat belajar mereka tetap tinggi. Hal ini menunjukkan adanya motivasi belajar tentang matematika khususnya representasi pecahan dari para peserta cukut tinggi.
References
Adu-gyamfi, K., Bossé, M. J., & Chandler, K. (2017). Student Connections between Algebraic and Graphical Polynomial Representations in the Context of a Polynomial Relation. 915–938. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9730-1
Adu-Gyamfi, K., Bossé, M. J., & Lynch-Davis, K. (2019). Three types of mathematical representational translations: Comparing empirical and theoretical results. School Science and Mathematics, 119(7), 396–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12360
Adu-gyamfi, K., Bossé, M. J., & Stiff, L. V. (2000). Lost in Translation : Examining Translation Errors Associated With Mathematical Representations. 159–170.
Bassok, M., & Olseth, K. L. (1995a). Judging a book by its cover: Interpretative effects of content on problem-solving transfer. Memory & Cognition, 23(3), 354–367. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197236
Bassok, M., & Olseth, K. L. (1995b). Object-Based Representations: Transfer Between Cases of Continuous and Discrete Models of Change. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(6), 1522–1538. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.6.1522
Bayaga, A., & Bossé, M. J. (2018). Semantic and syntactic fraction understanding. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 11(2), 135–142. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2019248587
Behr, M., Lesh, R., Post, T., & S. E. (1983). Rational-Number Concepts Rational Number Concepts. In R. Lesh & M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of Mathematics Concepts and Processes. New York: Academic Press, June, 91–125.
Bentley, B., & Bossé, M. J. (2018). College Students’ Understanding of Fraction Operations. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(3), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3881
Bossé, M., Adu-Gyamfi, K., & Chandler, K. (2014). Students’ Differentiated Translation Processes. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 828.
Bossé, M. J., Adu-Gyamfi, K., & Cheetham, M. (2011). Transitions Among Mathematical Representations: Teachers Beliefs and Practices. International Journal of Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 15(6), 1–23.
Brandhuber, T., Schneider, A., & Berberat, P. O. (2022). Implementing Kolb ´ s Experiential Learning Cycle by Linking Real Experience , Case-Based Discussion and Simulation. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205221091511
Čadež, T. H., & Kolar, V. M. (2018). How fifth-grade pupils reason about fractions: a reliance on part-whole subconstructs. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 99(3), 335–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9838-z
Castro-Rodríguez, E., Pitta-Pantazi, D., Rico, L., & Gómez, P. (2016). Prospective teachers’ understanding of the multiplicative part-whole relationship of fraction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 92(1), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9673-4
Cramer, K., Ahrendt, S., Monson, D., Wyberg, T., & Miller, C. (2017). Making sense of third-grade students’ misunderstandings of the number line. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 9(1), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2016.1245035
Cramer, K., Monson, D., Ahrendt, S., Wyberg, T., Pettis, C., & Fagerlund, C. (2019). Reconstructing the unit on the number line: Tasks to extend fourth graders’ fraction understandings. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 11(3), 180–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2018.1434594
de Cruz, H., & de Smedt, J. (2013). Mathematical symbols as epistemic actions. Synthese, 190(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9837-9
Duval, R. (2006). A cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in a learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1–2), 103–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-0400-z
Fellbaum, C. (1990). English verbs as a semantic net. International Journal of Lexicography, 3(4), 278–301. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/3.4.278
Fitri A & A. Widyaruli. (2017). Semantik: konsep dan contoh. Penerbit Madani, 1, 1–220.
Gamo, S., & Sander, E. (2010). Transfer of strategy use by semantic recoding in arithmetic problem solving. 20, 400–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.04.001
Gros, H., Thibaut, J. P., & Sander, E. (2020). Semantic congruence in arithmetic: A new conceptual model for word problem solving. Educational Psychologist, 55(2), 69–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2019.1691004
Hallett, D., Nunes, T., & Bryant, P. (2010). Individual Differences in Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge When Learning Fractions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(2), 395–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017486
James . Kaput, J. E. . S.-K. and J. C. (2020). Behavioral Objections : A Response to Wollman. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 16(1), 56–63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.16.1.0056
Kara, F., & Incikabi, L. (2018). Sixth grade students’ skills of using multiple representations in addition and subtraction operations in fractions. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 10(4), 463–474. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2018438137
Kara, F., & İncikabı, L. (2018). Sixth grade students’ preferences on multiple representations used in fraction operations and their performance in their preferences. Elementary Education Online, 17(4), 2136–2150. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2019.506984
Kilic, C. (2015). Analyzing pre-service primary teachers’ fraction knowledge structures through problem posing. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(6), 1603–1619. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1425a
Kiliç, Ç. (2013). Pre-Service Primary Teachers’ Free Problem-Posing Performances in the Context of Fractions: An Example from Turkey. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(4), 677–686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-013-0073-1
Koh, K., & Holyoak, K. J. (1987). Surface and structural similarity in analogical transfer. Memory & Cognition, 15(4), 332–340.
Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning Styles and Learning Spaces : Enhancing Experiential Learning in Higher Education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 193–212.
Leibovich, T., & Ansari, D. (2016). The Symbol-Grounding Problem in Numerical Cognition: A Review of Theory, Evidence, and Outstanding Questions. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(1), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/cep0000070
Lerman, S. (2014a). Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education (Stephen Le). Department of Education Centre for Mathematics Education London South Bank University London, UK.
Lerman, S. (2014b). Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Springer (Second edi). The registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0
Li, S., Wu, L., Feng, S., Xu, F., Xu, F., & Zhong, S. (2020). Graph-to-tree neural networks for learning structured input-output translation with applications to semantic parsing and math word problem. ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.255
Loe, E. (2017). The Verb “to hurt” in Dengka Dialect of Rote Language: The Study of Natural Semantic Metalanguage. SASDAYA, Gadjah Mada Journal of Humanities, Vol.1 No.2(1), 219–234.
Mainali, B. (2021). Representation in teaching and learning mathematics. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 9(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.1111
Marina Sbisa, Jan-Ola Ostman, and J. V. (2011). Philosophical Perspectives for Pragmatics. In Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (Vol. 10, Issue 9).
Martín-Fernández, E., Ruiz-Hidalgo, J. F., & Rico, L. (2019). Meaning and understanding of school mathematical concepts by secondary students: The study of sine and cosine. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(12). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/110490
Martin, S. A., & Bassok, M. (2005). Effects of semantic cues on mathematical modeling: Evidence from word-problem solving and equation construction tasks. Memory and Cognition, 33(3), 471–478. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193064
Meert, G., Grégoire, J., & Noël, M. P. (2009). Rational numbers: Componential versus holistic representation of fractions in a magnitude comparison task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1598–1616. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210802511162
Morgan, C., & Kynigos, C. (2014). Digital artefacts as representations: Forging connections between a constructionist and a social semiotic perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85(3), 357–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9523-1
Opfer, J. E., & DeVries, J. M. (2008). Representational change and magnitude estimation: Why young children can make more accurate salary comparisons than adults. Cognition, 108(3), 843–849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.05.003
Rapp, M., Bassok, M., DeWolf, M., & Holyoak, K. J. (2015). Modeling discrete and continuous entities with fractions and decimals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 21(1), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000036
Sáenz-Ludlow, A. (2006). Learning mathematics: increasing the value of initial mathematical wealth. Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación En Matemática Educativa RELIME, 9(Extraordinario 1), 225–245.
Sander, E., & Cedex, S. (2005). Analogy and Transfer : Encoding the Problem at the Right Level of Abstraction Analogy and Transfer : Encoding the Problem at the Right Level of Abstraction. June.
Sander, E., & Richard, J.-F. (2005). Analogy and Transfer : Encoding the Problem at the Right Level of Abstraction. Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 1925–1930.
Sasanguie, D., Defever, E., Maertens, B., & Reynvoet, B. (2014). The approximate number system is not predictive for symbolic number processing in kindergarteners. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(2), 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.803581
Uwingabire Immaculee and Takuya Baba. (2014). Multiple Representations Used By Rwandan Primary Teacher In Mathematics Lesson. Proceeding OfTthe Joint Meetiing Of PME 38 and PME-NA 36, 6, 254. (Issue 1404).
Vicente, S., Orrantia, J., & Verschaffel, L. (2007). Influence of situational and conceptual rewording on word problem solving. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(4), 829–848. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709907X178200
